<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forget the spin – I want it straight up!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spinsucks.com/2008-presidential-election/forget-the-spin-%e2%80%93-i-want-it-straight-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spinsucks.com/2008-presidential-election/forget-the-spin-%e2%80%93-i-want-it-straight-up/</link>
	<description>Spin Sucks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:02:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Hassler</title>
		<link>http://www.spinsucks.com/2008-presidential-election/forget-the-spin-%e2%80%93-i-want-it-straight-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1580</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Hassler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spinsucks.com/?p=398#comment-1580</guid>
		<description>I agree that “the media should not be allowed to carelessly report every new statistic or poll result that crosses their editor’s desk,” and “poll results affect public opinion.” However, I disagree that the media is “leading many to believe... the presidential election sways one way or the other.” I argue they report what results suggest public opinion at the time.

A high volume of media surrounding a closely matched election encourages people to get out and vote. If the American public need a nudge (the possibility that their man falling behind) to take advantage of their democratic right, is that so wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that “the media should not be allowed to carelessly report every new statistic or poll result that crosses their editor’s desk,” and “poll results affect public opinion.” However, I disagree that the media is “leading many to believe&#8230; the presidential election sways one way or the other.” I argue they report what results suggest public opinion at the time.</p>
<p>A high volume of media surrounding a closely matched election encourages people to get out and vote. If the American public need a nudge (the possibility that their man falling behind) to take advantage of their democratic right, is that so wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
